[sldev] Your Feedback Wanted on Search Flagging !
me at signpostmarv.name
Sat May 3 04:34:46 PDT 2008
cF = UNIX_TIMESTAMP(`date_content_flagged`)
cP = UNIX_TIMESTAMP(`date_content_posted`)
fA = UNIX_TIMESTAMP(`date_flagger_avatar_born`)
N = number_of_flaggings
T = (cF - cP) / (cF - fA)
W = weight_of_flagging = N / T
If my math is right, the algebra blurb I've typed out above makes fewer
flaggings from older avatars more substantial than flash-mobbing content
with freshly created accounts.
It also makes older avatars' flaggings carry more weight on older content.
Using a weighted scheme (perhaps not using the formula I've described
here), would be far more preferable than if (N = x) take action.
Jeska Dzwigalski wrote:
> Thanks for all the great thoughts everyone, very helpful! I wanted to
> clarify that the Search Flagging described is for search listings --
> not inworld content, avatar or group profiles, land sales etc. - it is
> ONLY for parcel listings, classified ads and events listings. Also,
> for those who are concerned about abuse/griefing, here is some more
> detail on the proposed design:
> * If a listing is flagged as "Mature" by x Residents and is not marked
> Mature, it will be automatically changed to Mature - it will not be
> removed. Totally agree that more clarity is needed around what is
> "mature" (and "prohibited") I will take that back to the Governance
> Team as feedback.
> * If a listing is flagged as "Prohibited" by x Residents, it will be
> automatically taken down and reviewed by the Governance team.
> Prohibited listings might include listings for gambling or child
> * Not all accounts are able to flag search listings, anonymous basic
> Residents or Residents who are under x days old will not be able to
> participate in search flagging.
> * Each account which can flag is only able do so once per search
> listing and there is a limit to the amount of search listings each
> account can flag per day.
> * One account flagging a listing will NOT cause it to be automatically
> * Nominate for Showcase is that exactly - a nomination for review by
> an editorial board for possible inclusion.
> * Any classified ads that are taken down will be refunded (prorated
> for time active), with notification
> Are there any other restrictions to who can flag or when/how/etc
> anyone can think of to help both prevent overt abuse while still
> helping stem grievous abuse of search listings (see: current Event
> Calendar spam as one example)?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 3249 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Url : http://lists.secondlife.com/pipermail/sldev/attachments/20080503/a5872887/smime.bin
More information about the SLDev