[sldev] [META] Formal critique of new auth mechanism?
dale at daleglass.net
Sat Sep 29 11:50:15 PDT 2007
On Saturday 29 September 2007 19:44:48 Rob Lanphier wrote:
> The goal is to have something
> that multiple people feel good attaching their name to; it doesn't have
> to be the unanimous consensus of the list, but the more names of people
> who we recognize as thoughtful contributors, the more weight it will
> carry. If this can be completed in a timely manner, I'll work with the
> team on a detailed response
On that, should we attach a list of names to the page?
Something like a list of who endorses a particular criticism?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://lists.secondlife.com/pipermail/sldev/attachments/20070929/0706d242/attachment.pgp
More information about the SLDev