[sldev] [POLICY] Development by consensus (Re: Question regarding upcoming maintenance on 11/27-11/28)

Tateru Nino tateru.nino at gmail.com
Thu Nov 22 16:53:57 PST 2007

Argent Stonecutter wrote:
> On 22-Nov-2007, at 17:04, Rob Lanphier wrote:
>> On 11/22/07 2:12 PM, Matthew Dowd wrote:
>>> More fundamentally, LL needs to make up its mind whether it really
>>> does want to adopt a open community development model as it appears
>>> to aspire to or a closed development model as it tends to end up
>>> doing in practice!
>> Do you think we should put all of our architectural decisions up for
>> vote?
> I think that's an unfair characterization of Matthew's message.
> There's a lot of room between "going ahead without discussion" and
> "putting everything up to a vote".
I must concur with Argent. The two positions are not equivalent.

Tateru Nino

More information about the SLDev mailing list