[sldev] [META] Open source more of LSL?

Hamncheese me at hamncheeseomlet.com
Mon Nov 12 21:40:24 PST 2007

Uhm...thanks to open source I now present you with this viola 

I really hope you are joking.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Jason Giglio" <gigstaggart at gmail.com>
To: <sldev at lists.secondlife.com>
Sent: Monday, November 12, 2007 8:29 AM
Subject: [sldev] [META] Open source more of LSL?

> Is there any way we could have more of LSL open sourced?  I'm sitting here 
> writing a script, and because there's no llSetLinkTexture, I'm spending 
> like 6 hours making this thing way more complicated than it needs to be. 
> I could have probably written llSetLinkTexture by now.
> So can we have more of the LSL source code open sourced?
> I know this'll probably get some reply about mono.  I think it's pretty 
> obvious mono is going to stay vaporware for the foreseeable future.  We 
> need LSL to stop sucking *now*, not 2-3 years from now.  I'm sure there's 
> several scripters who'd be happy to provide improvements for LSL, even if 
> it'll all be throw away when and if mono ever happens.
> -Jason
> _______________________________________________
> Click here to unsubscribe or manage your list subscription:
> https://lists.secondlife.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sldev 

More information about the SLDev mailing list