[sldev] [META] Open source more of LSL?
me at hamncheeseomlet.com
Mon Nov 12 21:40:24 PST 2007
Uhm...thanks to open source I now present you with this viola
I really hope you are joking.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jason Giglio" <gigstaggart at gmail.com>
To: <sldev at lists.secondlife.com>
Sent: Monday, November 12, 2007 8:29 AM
Subject: [sldev] [META] Open source more of LSL?
> Is there any way we could have more of LSL open sourced? I'm sitting here
> writing a script, and because there's no llSetLinkTexture, I'm spending
> like 6 hours making this thing way more complicated than it needs to be.
> I could have probably written llSetLinkTexture by now.
> So can we have more of the LSL source code open sourced?
> I know this'll probably get some reply about mono. I think it's pretty
> obvious mono is going to stay vaporware for the foreseeable future. We
> need LSL to stop sucking *now*, not 2-3 years from now. I'm sure there's
> several scripters who'd be happy to provide improvements for LSL, even if
> it'll all be throw away when and if mono ever happens.
> Click here to unsubscribe or manage your list subscription:
More information about the SLDev