[sldev] ESC exempt from open source and GPL licensing?

Tateru Nino tateru.nino at gmail.com
Sat Nov 10 23:22:40 PST 2007

Taran Rampersad wrote:
> Argent Stonecutter wrote:
>> On 10-Nov-2007, at 20:35, Taran Rampersad wrote:
>>> Software developers aren't lawyers and shouldn't have to be. Saying that
>>> the code is GPL'd attracts developers who contribute in good faith.
>> The code is *open source*. If it matters to you so much whether it's
>> GPL or LGPL or BSDL or Microsoft Reciprocal License or Apache license
>> that you wouldn't contribute if it's not GPL with no ifs, ands, or
>> buts... then you're not speaking for the majority of developers. 
> Are you?
None of us do. We all speak for ourselves alone.

Tateru Nino

More information about the SLDev mailing list