[sldev] ESC exempt from open source and GPL licensing?

Tateru Nino tateru.nino at gmail.com
Sat Nov 10 17:39:42 PST 2007


Hands up everyone who has signed and submitted a contributor agreement
and didn't take the time to read it and know this?

Hamncheese wrote:
> Dale,
>
> I guess what you are saying is that if I submit a patch that was
> accepted by LL in say 1.18.1 and I decide in 1.23.0 that I have (or a
> company that employs me) a commercial interest in extending the work
> that was done before (and accepted) that I can't license the viewer
> commercially? Or are you saying "don't do anything if you have any
> commercial expectations"?
>
> I guess it doesn't matter to me really what the answer is. I've gotten
> "what I expected" from anything I've submitted.
>
> Thanks,
> Ham
>
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Dale Glass" <dale at daleglass.net>
> To: <sldev at lists.secondlife.com>
> Cc: "Hamncheese" <me at hamncheeseomlet.com>
> Sent: Saturday, November 10, 2007 1:57 PM
> Subject: Re: [sldev] ESC exempt from open source and GPL licensing?
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Click here to unsubscribe or manage your list subscription:
> https://lists.secondlife.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sldev
>

-- 
Tateru Nino
http://dwellonit.blogspot.com/



More information about the SLDev mailing list