[sldev] Re: Plugin architecture

Callum Lerwick seg at haxxed.com
Sun Mar 4 18:26:53 PST 2007

On Sun, 2007-03-04 at 03:11 -0800, Tim Shephard wrote:
> The fact still remains, if we write code that links against the code
> in SL it is not clearly legally secure from being opened up.  While I
> disagree with Callum's philosophy, as far I can tell, he's shining a
> lot of very much needed clear light on this discussion.

Don't confuse my philosophy with Linden Lab's choice to license under
the GPL. I haven't even mentioned what *my* philosophy is...
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.secondlife.com/pipermail/sldev/attachments/20070304/64b60323/attachment.pgp

More information about the SLDev mailing list