[SLED] What do we lose
EMarrapodi at Trinitas.org
Mon Apr 23 07:20:14 PDT 2012
Great reply. I agree with most of what you said except for perhaps the
voicing. Its been a while since I've been a student but I seem to
remember that we couldn't just blurt things out and talk over the
teacher, even on the college level. So same could be done for an
in-world class where the students have their voice button turned off and
perhaps use some sort of signal (typed code or hand raising animation)
during or at the end of the lecture where the teacher could call upon
the student who then would use voice to ask their question. I've taken
webinars where only the instructor could voice until we were given the
signal or capability of being able to talk. I would think this a minor
obstacle, especially compared to the dyslexia disability for a text
I don't know, does everyone just talk over each other and the teacher in
class these days?
Elisabeth Jacobsen Marrapodi
Director, Library Services
Trinitas Regional Medical Center
225 Williamson Street
Elizabeth, New Jersey 07207
"A cheerful heart is good medicine" Proverbs 17:22
"Google can give you 1,000 answers to your question. A librarian will
give you the right one."
From: educators-bounces at lists.secondlife.com
[mailto:educators-bounces at lists.secondlife.com] On Behalf Of Eloise
Sent: Monday, April 23, 2012 9:58 AM
To: SL Educators (The SLED List)
Subject: Re: [SLED] What do we lose
I was going to phrase it slightly different but basically I agree with
"We" don't gain or lose anything universally. Each teacher and each
class and I suspect each student within each class will gain some things
and lose some things thanks to the teaching style and environment.
This is pretty much true of real life teaching situations as well - I
remember as I'm sure many school science teachers will - teaching in a
science lab. There were too many students for each one to have a seat
and something to write on and to sit facing towards the front. The class
went OK but I can't help wonder how the people who had their backs to me
did compared to the people facing me and the board. I had a dyslexic
student in the group too, who I know perceived the class differently to
the rest and was happy when I started writing all the jargon terms on
the board to make sure she could see the right spelling without having
I equally remember a class where I was a student that was suddenly moved
to a different lecture theatre. Everything was different, difficult and
in the wrong place. I don't have a clue what I was meant to learn that
day but I remember the class for how hard it was to learn in.
Teachers who rely on seeing students' faces will struggle. Those who
like lively oral debates may or may not. Those who like a more in-depth
discussion might find it's better because the medium allows for that.
Deaf students in a text-heavy environment might shine. If you stay
text-heavy then dyslexia is suddenly a rather public rather than a
private disability. If you use voice a lot I don't know what you gain
and lose - but I imagine a fair bit of talking over each other because
cues for turn-taking are harder to organise.
If you do things with modelling, prim or scripted, then you have a
relatively cheap environment to do it in. That has to be weighed against
the fact that you're learning non-industry-standard tools. If you're
working with modern languages you have a good chance for your students
to find native speakers to chat to and learn the current idiom. They may
also learn current text-speak. Things like brgd for obrigado/obrigada in
If you're teaching English you have ways for people to role-play in
certain environments: to explore Elsinor, to visit the Inferno, to walk
on the moon... and so on.
And if you're teaching maths none of this will probably matter to you...
So it's a question that I think is meaningless because it's just too
On 22 Apr 2012, at 20:55, Ed Lamoureux wrote:
On Apr 22, 2012, at 2:00 PM, educators-request at lists.secondlife.com
I'm wondering if you could help me to answer a question I was recently
asked. The question is 'What do we lose in virtual world education?'
educating through a VW instead of a face-to-face context).
Mediated communication is NEVER equivalent to face-to-face
communication. There are ALWAYS pluses and minuses in each mode.
The factors in a teaching/learning situation are NUMEROUS, almost to the
point of infinite variety.
Claiming that teachers don't use mediated methods (only or mostly)
because they are resistant to change, slow to adapt, not good with
technology, and the like, often misses many factors in the educational
equation while casting undue blame on, generally, thoughtful and
Further, mediated communication environments are immature, relative to
face-to-face modes. Virtual environments . . . in the extreme. While
western culture has some old and new ideas about what works face-to-face
(and why or why not) we have MUCH LESS to go on regarding mediated
I'm pretty unwilling to answer the question directly. Every single thing
one can say depends on an extraordinary number of contexts and
variables. Experience and research and analysis may, someday, enable us
to make educated reflections on the contours of the answer(s). For now,
I think about all we can say is that "it's complicated."
Edward Lee Lamoureux, Ph. D.
Associate Professor, Department of Interactive Media
and Department of Communication
<ell at bradley.edu>
1501 W. Bradley, Peoria IL 61625
office: 309-677-2378 cell: 309-635-2605
AIM/IM & skype: dredleelam
Second Life: Professor Beliveau/the Professor
Intellectual Property Law and Interactive Media: Free for a Fee
<http://freeforafee.com <http://freeforafee.com/> >
This e-mail may contain confidential and privileged material for viewing
by the intended recipient. Any further use or distribution without
permission from Lamoureux, is prohibited.
Educators mailing list
"Privileged and Confidential: The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the intended recipient(s). If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or an agent responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this document in error and that any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail, and delete the original message"
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Educators