[SLED] Comparisons to other MUVEs (was Introduction)
cbraun at bseng.com
Wed Oct 11 17:07:58 PDT 2006
I've used There.com and I find it horribly limited compared to SL. To me
There.com compared to SL is like a cartoon compared to RL, the level of
sophistication simply isn't there and not likely to ever be there.
There is no comparison between SL and any other platform for a combination
of avatar design, building, scripting and animation.
For all the faults SL has such as frequent lag and texture loading problems
it's still the best of its kind.
From: educators-bounces at lists.secondlife.com
[mailto:educators-bounces at lists.secondlife.com] On Behalf Of James Morgan
Sent: Wednesday, October 11, 2006 2:34 PM
To: border at smtp.spa.umn.edu; SL Educators
Subject: Re: [SLED] Comparisons to other MUVEs (was Introduction)
I have only briefly dipped a toe into There.com, it was a little
awkward after using SL for over a year, but I expect I would get use
Being that I was only in for an hour or so my impressions are
certainly not accurate.
Do they experience any issues with griefing? If so does anyone know
how they deal with it, or have first hand experience with griefers in
On Oct 11, 2006, at 2:24 PM, Pete Border wrote:
> Another advantage of There is that, since the entire world is
> designed by one set of people, it is much more stylistically
> coherent. Everything in There has the same sort of design and fits
> together well. The colors are coordinated, buildings all belong to
> the styles, the trees work with the buildings, etc. And the default
> avs also fit with the rest of the world.
> Lauren Gelman wrote:
>> I don't think it's a zero sum game... I think if There does not
>> move to support multiple platforms it's going to be a problem for
>> teaching because I can't even get some students in world. In SL,
>> I can't get students to spend hours on the intro island just to
>> attend a one hour class. In There, I can't create teaching
>> environments tailored to my needs. In SL, I can't use voice so
>> typing a lesson takes twice as long....
>> My theology says that SL's openess can win out over the long run
>> in a competition between virtual worlds at the meta level (just
>> look at their willingness to be hosts to this conversation which
>> is incredible!) but right now for teaching I think there are
>> upsides/downsides to each.
>> I'm really interested in trying to figure out metrics for
>> thinking through whether a vw class is effective in any world..
>> Does anyone have surveys you give to teachers or students after a
>> class? Or any other metrics you've come up with besides the
>> obvious one--testing students on materials presented-- which may
>> not be appropriate for the kind of casual learning we're trying?
>> Are there old list threads you can point me to?
>>> SL has by far the better avatars. Perhaps the best avatars at
>>> this time.
>>> Quite a bit of subtle non-verbal communication is built into SL
>>> as they look around to people who type etc.
>>> Personally, going from SL to There and back feels almost as going
>>> RL to SL and back to me. There, however, has much better vehicles.
>>> On Sep 25, 2006, at 4:24 PM, Gene Koo wrote:
>>> I"m basing my comments about avatar appearance in SL partly on my
>>> wife's total outsider feedback and partly on my own experience. I
>>> think that There.com set a lower bar for itself, so no direct
>>> comparison is possible with SL. There just doesn't allow you to
>>> customize your avatar (or anything else) to the degree that SL
>>> does. However, what that also means is that the/ default/
>>> animations, graphics, etc. look better. I know that highly
>>> customized SL avatars look awesome -- but I am talking about what
>>> the experience is like for n00bs who may not want to spend their
>>> first 2 hours in the MUVE fiddling with their bits to look kewl.
>>> Initiatives like what you describe will probably be a Good
>>> Thing. Those of us who intend to use these spaces for different
>>> purposes would do well to identify what makes a platform work for
>>> certain situations and not for others and make that happen. I
>>> have no doubt that what I am saying is good about There for
>>> certain types of classes can be replicated in SL -- I would/
>>> love/ to see that happen!
>>> (Add in-engine web browsing to the list :)
>>> *From:* Ramesh Ramloll [mailto:r.ramloll at gmail.com]
>>> ... Regarding quality of graphics and how good avatars look, I
>>> think that you might be off the mark porbably because SL is so
>>> huge, that it is easy to miss the good looking ones. I have
>>> a lot of good things about the quality of some adult activities
>>> in SL at SLCC this year. I did not have a chance to check it
>>> but I imagine the avatars should at least look good, otherwise
>>> there would not have been so many people raving about it. I
>>> think, and some eLearning companies on this list is already
>>> it, there is a need for these type of interests to build
>>> spaces that could easily mimic what There now offers and this
>>> will probably address the needs of your audience. Think of it
>>> like running There in SL, a bit like running XP on the iMac :)
>>> Educators mailing list
>>> To unsubscribe
>>> Educators mailing list
>>> To unsubscribe
>> Lauren Gelman Center for Internet and Society
>> Stanford Law School
>> (ph) 650-724-3358
>> Educators mailing list
>> To unsubscribe
> Educators mailing list
> To unsubscribe
Educators mailing list
More information about the Educators